Skill

Risk Assessment

Assess an account for churn and health risk, scoring engagement signals into severity levels with a tailored mitigation plan.

Goal

Produce a structured account health risk assessment that scores churn signals by severity and delivers a concrete mitigation plan for each identified risk.

Trigger

Invoke when an CSM needs to evaluate an account before a QBR, after a support escalation, at renewal, or when usage drops are detected.

Steps

  1. 1

    Analyze the account data below and extract all observable signals across these dimensions: product usage trends, support ticket volume/sentiment, NPS or CSAT scores, stakeholder engagement, contract value and renewal timeline, and any recent escalations or executive changes. $account_data

    • All six signal dimensions are reviewed
    • Both quantitative metrics and qualitative notes are captured
    Analyze the account data below and extract all observable signals across these dimensions: product usage trends, support ticket volume/sentiment, NPS or CSAT scores, stakeholder engagement, contract value and renewal timeline, and any recent escalations or executive changes.
    
    $account_data
  2. 2

    Score each identified signal on a 3-tier severity scale: Critical (likely churn within 90 days), At-Risk (churn possible within 6 months), or Healthy (no immediate concern). Assign a severity label and a 1–2 sentence rationale for each signal.

    • Every extracted signal from Step 1 receives a severity label
    • Rationale is specific to the signal, not generic
  3. 3

    Calculate an overall Account Health Score by weighting the severity distribution: Critical signals carry 3x weight, At-Risk carry 1.5x, Healthy carry 1x. Output a score from 0–100 and a corresponding health tier: Red (0–40), Yellow (41–70), Green (71–100).

    • Weighting logic is applied correctly
    • Final score and tier label are clearly stated
  4. 4

    For each Critical and At-Risk signal, generate a specific mitigation action: identify the recommended action, the internal owner role (e.g., CSM, AE, Support Lead), a suggested timeline, and the success metric that would indicate resolution.

    • Every Critical and At-Risk signal has a mitigation action
    • Each action includes owner, timeline, and success metric
  5. 5

    Summarize the full assessment into an executive brief of 3–5 sentences covering: the account's overall health tier, the top 1–2 risks driving the score, and the single highest-priority action the team should take this week.

    • Brief is under 5 sentences
    • Highest-priority action is explicit and actionable

Output format

Structure the response in clearly labeled sections: (1) Signal Inventory table with columns for Signal, Dimension, and Severity; (2) Account Health Score with tier label and weighting breakdown; (3) Mitigation Plan table with columns for Signal, Action, Owner, Timeline, and Success Metric; (4) Executive Brief as a short paragraph. Use plain language suitable for a CSM to share directly with their manager.

Use it everywhere

Copy this skill into your library to inject it into Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini — or install your whole library as / slash commands in Claude Code and Cowork.

Get started free →